Sunday, October 18, 2026

Shoelace.

 

Decades ago, my doctor told me that world war, famine, pestilence, stock market losses, and company politics wouldn’t cause my heart attack.

It would be a broken shoelace. 

As a precaution, I’ve been wearing slip-ons for years. It isn’t enough.

What set me off the other morning were pictures of the Oval Office.

Somebody on Facebook showed pictures of the President’s office from previous administrations. Each president gets to redecorate the famous room. New furniture is brought in. Old pictures come out of storage. The occasional bust or two on shelves. Maybe a new rug with the Seal on it. Things change, but the room remains the same: refined yet majestic, understated but powerful.

Then they showed a picture of today’s Oval.

A shoelace broke…

It is a metaphor for the administration. Disrespect for our institutions. Disregard for the rule of law. Narcissism run amok. Cheap golden stuff on walls. The Oval turned into a TV set.

 Money masquerading as class.

Why?

Millions accepted the call of a different man, with a self-built narcissistic approach to life, who, truth be told, was able to gather and bale the wants and fears of those who felt left out by the educated elites and corporate giants.

For generations, they were told that higher education was the secret to a better life. But many could not afford it, meet the requirements, or wanted it. Those who did gathered in urban areas to work in high-tech or high-level professions, making economic decisions unaware of, or unconcerned about, those outside their circles; even the communities they left, small towns devastated by job loss, store closings, and encroaching poverty.

A pandemic increased frustrations, restricted life, smashed relationships, reduced incomes, lowered educational opportunities, and changed a way of life. Public health became a political piƱata. Who to believe? Many thought it was too much for too little gain. They felt the pain.

And somewhere a shoelace breaks.

Many got what they wanted. Few expected everything that followed. The first term was prologue. But the second…

Bravado was appealing. Why sign on for more of the same? Why sign on to more culture bending? Let’s try something different. What do you have to lose? A lot, it seems.

War without strategy. Armaments depleted with no replenishment plan. Corruption that would make Nixon blush and Harding flush. Rule by executive order. Laws ignored. Buildings torn asunder. Citizens arrested on the streets because of their looks. People deported to countries they have never set foot in. Democracy itself shattered—anguished drama in four acts.

Two more years before the curtain falls.

A mid-term election looms. Too close to call, maybe? Does the majority want more of the same or a return to regular order: three equal branches of government working together to form the more perfect union? A return to the rule of law? Expanded voting opportunity rather than restricted participation?

The nation, like the Oval, needs a redo. A return to when a simple office reflected a simple way of life yet was the seat of world order and massive innovation, not a daily pop-up TV show. A dream for everyone who chose a path to happiness. A return, perhaps, to when officials remembered that they took an oath to preserve and protect the Constitution. To when the presidency was a hallowed position dedicated to executing the laws, not trying to make them.

One man was able to reduce the power and prestige of the world’s strongest and freest nation in such a short time. It’s scary. That one doesn’t see the historic majesty of the Oval Office is frightening as well. Some things are better left alone. Some things are sacred.

Shoelaces are expensive. Probably imported with a tariff. Snap!

 

Monday, September 7, 2026

Obsession.

 

I’m as easily distracted as I am obsessed. Show me something new, and I’m all over it. It’s easy to recognize my obsessions. It will wear off quickly because something new will replace it. AI, not so much.

Lots of new technologies creep up on you; you don’t notice them right away. Then, all of a sudden, you wonder how you existed without it. That was Steve Jobs’ thing: invent an Apple product people don’t need but can’t live without once they get it. 

I downloaded Grammarly. It corrects spelling, punctuation, and grammar as I’m typing. It’s been helpful for a few years now. And it likes the Oxford Comma.

Like most people, I use Google every day.  It gives me several websites that might have the answer to my question. It did that very well for years.   Now it just gives me the answer. It did it without telling me it was going to. I can’t live without it.  

I’m not concerned about AI agents running a manufacturing plant or waging a drone war. Well, I am when I put on my political hat, but not for this discussion. I think AI is worth obsessing over for the things I want it to do for me.

There are a lot of AI choices, but I like  ChatGPT. It’s obsession-worthy. It thinks, it remembers, and it learns. It knows me. 

I downloaded it to my phone a couple of years ago and then ignored it. I returned to it some months ago because I wanted to deep-dive into some medical test results. I copied the test results, pasted them into Chat (GPT is too much trouble to add every time I use the app), and asked for an analysis and prognosis. It took three seconds to get a multi-page report and a list of questions to ask the doctor at my next visit. The doctor had the same analysis and suggested remedies.

I’m involved with an HOA. I pasted the monthly income statement and budget and asked for a variance report. A few seconds later, it produced an in-depth report with key action items. It was CPA quality.

Consider the bigger picture.

A next-generation AI model is expected to achieve AGI. Will it match or exceed human capabilities? We’ll see. Scientists have striven to reach this capability for decades. If it's here, what do we do with it? More importantly, what don’t we allow it to do?

We are at the start of a sea change in how the world operates and how we live. We survived technological disruption before, but this one is different.  It isn’t moving at generational speed. It feels like a generation is now just a few months.  

During the Industrial Revolution, companies built huge factories. That changed neighborhoods, increased the need for electricity and steam, and eliminated jobs. It took us from an agrarian culture to an urban society. It wasn’t easy. It took a while. It was painful for many 

Today, companies are building mega data centers. They require vast amounts of water for cooling and electricity to process big data. We will live through this revolution. But it will be painful. We aren’t ready.

Past cultural and industrial changes took ten to twenty years to become the norm. We moved slower back then. The new disruption changes every few months. We aren’t ready. Governments aren’t ready.  

A recent NBC poll found that seven in ten adults feel apprehension rather than excitement about AI. It won’t get a ticker-tape parade as the moon landing did. A large majority don’t want AI data centers in their communities and fear the lost jobs AI will engender. Both sides of the political divide are unified in their wariness of AI.

Only thirty percent of us embrace it. I use it daily. It doesn’t just spit out info; it suggests alternatives, weighs risk, all with a conversational tone. I’m a point-and-click computer user. I don’t create complicated Excel worksheets. I just want to know.  

I came late to AI.  I’ve read about it for some time and wondered about it. Is it as important as they say? Is it as powerful, useful, or dangerous? I don’t know. But now that I’m using it,  an obsession seems like a reasonable status at this point.

Tuesday, August 18, 2026

What to Expect.

 

I’ve been watching the machinations we call the federal government. The state level isn’t much better, but let’s stick to the really disappointing stuff.

The upcoming campaign season is starting to be about socialism, left-wing terribleness, or even worse, a candidate name that doesn’t appear in Burke’s Peerage.

The Founding Fathers got it right when they created three co-equal branches of government. The Federalist Papers (51) warned of the dangers of a strong president and a weak legislature. They should have added a weak judiciary.

Many conservatives live by a singular mantra: the government that governs least governs best. No one wants the government interfering too much in their daily lives, but I would suggest that the role of government is to do good things for its people: to ensure that all people are treated equally, to ensure they have a good life, that they can secure happiness for themselves and their families, that they are free from oppression.

We have done big and bold things in the past. We can continue to do great things again. The fear of big government is no excuse for no government at all.

Think Tennessee Valley Authority, Social Security, Rural Electrification, Affordable Care Act,   Medicare, the Civil Rights Act, putting a man on the moon,  

As we move closer to November’s election season, it is time to ask what we should reasonably expect government to accomplish for the ordinary citizens. I have a few suggestions that I would proffer to any candidate running for national office.

Reasonable taxes for all: Our progressive federal tax system is broken. Every individual and every corporation should pay their fair share. People who don’t make much money shouldn’t pay much. Those who make a lot should pay a lot. Everyone should pay the same percentage of their wages and investment income in Social Security taxes regardless of income level.

Healthcare for all: We are one of the few countries in the world that doesn’t consider healthcare a human right. There are models out there that demonstrate how an efficient and effective system can work: the Mayo Clinic and Kaiser Permanente, for example. Both are committed to a systems approach to medicine and healthcare. Healthcare needs to be universal, no matter which plan we use to pay for it. But we know one thing for sure: for-profit hospitals are in the business of making a profit, not healthcare, and private insurance companies are in the business of making a profit, not paying clients’ bills.  

Safe drinking water for all: Millions of people lack basic clean water in their homes. Municipal water systems across the country don’t meet the Safe Drinking Water Act standard for purity and absence of contaminants. Everyone deserves clean drinking water.

Broadband for all: Every home should have access to high-quality internet services. The world’s technology is changing the way almost everything works, how people communicate, how people work, how we educate. Those without broadband will be left behind.

Livable wages for all: The last time minimum wages were raised, I had almost no white hair. The current federal minimum wage is way below the poverty level for many families in various parts of the country. People should be able to expect a reasonably comfortable life working one job.

Mental healthcare for all who need it: Too many people cannot get good mental health care even though there are several programs designed to help them. Those programs tend not to be built into an effective delivery system. We lack clinics. Patients have to work their way through a maze of overlapping regulations. Many don’t have sufficient insurance coverage. We should build and support mental health clinics and services for everyone, not just those with great insurance.

A campaign platform for all: Don’t tell me who you fear and dislike. Being anti-Trump or pro-Trump is not a platform. Tell us what you intend to do to help make us a better country. I just gave you some ideas. I don’t want to go back. Life wasn’t all that great for everyone back then. Too many were left out of the good life.  

 

So, you want my vote? Tell me what you are going to do about healthcare, wages, taxes, water, technology, mental illness, and the quality of American life. Tell me what you intend to build – not what you plan to tear down.

 

 

 

Sunday, August 2, 2026

The Fund

 

To celebrate the end of July, our Dear Leader posted an early morning rant on Truth Social, his version of X. He was really worked up about lame-duck Senator John Cornyn’s opposition to the “Fund.” It’s a billion-dollar slush fund that the administration can hand out to the  “American Patriots” who stormed the Capitol on January 6th. We have all seen the videos. Pictures of men in camo harming police, seeking the Vice President so they could hang him, desecrating the inside of the citadel of democracy. We all saw what those evil people did at the boss’s encouragement.

He wrote. “They are suffering still, many ruined, and I felt that they should be given compensation for what has been done to them. I gave up any payment to myself, which would have been substantial…” [i]

He said that the ruffians were victims of abuse. They were not. They were the ones who abused. Just ask the police officers who tried to protect the Capitol.

He said their lives have been ruined. Hopefully, most of them either pleaded guilty or were convicted of storming the domed edifice, attacking police, crashing barriers and windows, ravaging the offices, and trying to stop the counting of Presidential ballots. For that, their lives should be ruined. They should be in prison.

On his first days in office for his second and last term, he pardoned nearly every participant in that effort to overthrow the government. Fifteen hundred of them. On the first day. Now he wants to pay them for their trouble.

The first day of the second term should have been a lesson for us, but few believed it could get worse. It is worse. It gets worse by the day. On August 1st, he announced that he wanted to bring back The Fund because, as he said: “Perhaps there has never been a group of people treated so badly in our Nation’s history.”

In truth, there has never been a group of people who treated the nation so badly in our Nation’s history since the Civil War. They deserve lives ruined, lives incarcerated. They owe us; we don’t owe them.

 

 

 

 

 



[i] Donald J. Trump, Truth Social, July 31, 2026, 7:03 AM ET

Saturday, July 4, 2026

The Idea of America!

 

Spain settled St. Augustine, Florida in 1565. The English established Jamestown in Virginia in 1607. The European exploration and takeover of North America was in full swing. Yet it took until July 4,1776 for the colonies on the eastern side of the continent to declare their independence. Two-hundred-fifty years ago to this very day,  211 years after the first settlements. It took the folks a while to catch up with the Age of Reason and embrace the Enlightenment.

The Founders shook the world:

 We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,

Aspirational, to say the least, most of us are still trying to get our heads around the idea. It’s been a good run but not an easy one.

Can we say today that most Americans believe that all men are created equal? Can we say that most Americans believe that all men have unalienable rights – Life, Liberty, the Pursuit of Happiness? Do most Americans believe their government should derive its just powers from the consent of the governed?

Who you are, where you are, and when you were then may shape your honest response. That friction is why we strive to create a more perfect union. Our answers shouldn’t be different. Why don’t we all just look at the idea and shout YES! 

A survey by the Public Religion Research Institute indicated that 51% of Americans say they are extremely or very proud of being Americans, down from 82% in 2013.[i] This is serious stuff. (Other recent surveys show that only 60%+/- are positive about the current state of the nation.)

Many polls show that less than half of those surveyed believe the idea that working hard gets you ahead. Among 18-29 year-olds, only 36% believe in the “American Dream.” These are the folks that are going to take us into the next decade or two. If they lose faith in the greatness of America, how will the experiment survive? We rely on them to take us along, to meet the new challenges, to innovate, and to protect the homeland. Will they want to do it if they don’t believe in the Experiment, in the Dream?

Years ago, a lot of us were taught about the greatness of America in a mix of courses under the general mantle of Social Studies. The rubric was a sanitized version of history designed to make us feel proud of the country, feel patriotic, and want to serve; we were a nation of exceptionalism, the best nation on earth, believe we are the best.

After World War II, we basked in the glory of saving the world from the Axis Powers. We built planes and munition factories. Sixteen million men and women joined the armed forces to fight in Europe and Asia and we won. Over four-hundred thousand didn’t come home.

Then we rebuilt Europe. We oversaw the redevelopment of much of Asia. Our rich farm land and natural resources let us feed the world and create a large middle class with good housing, good educations, and good jobs. The text didn’t teach us about segregation, the poverty of Appalachia, the notion of white supremacy, even though it was all around us. Those lessons came much later.

Like so many other nations, generational change after generational change, and more change brought periods of growth and prosperity, periods of growth and despair, not so much growth and resistance, and the growth of nationalism that we experience today.

The angst on both sides of the political divide ripples outward, creating rings of concern about what it means to be an American in today’s world. Some try to be overly definitive – of white European descent, unfettered capitalism, conflating Christianity and Americanism, discounting the universal ideals of our founding documents, loss of respect for the role institutions play in the fabric of our culture and society. The more we try to be specific, the more we drift from our original intent.

Being American isn’t easy. The last 250 years taught us that. Being American is difficult. It isn’t based on hard and fast rules: tribal identity, bloodlines, religious beliefs, or other specifics. It is based on an idea. The only thing that we ask of anyone who is born on our soil or comes to our shores is that they buy into the idea. If you swear allegiance to the idea, you are an American.

New citizens take an oath – “… I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic…” That’s it. You’re in.

Here is the idea – “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union …”  The majesty of those words is overwhelming. They are the scepter we hold on high. It was outrageous thinking at its writing. Governments were the property of kings, emperors, dictators, autocrats, and others with big armies, not we the people. We changed the calculus. But that is the idea. “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…” That’s it. Buy into that idea and you are an American.

There is no reason this republic can’t last another 250 years if its population reminds itself from time to time of the great truths and ideals upon which it was founded. The current period of misunderstanding of those ideals will be overthrown even if the incumbent oligarchs aren’t. We are ruled by “We the people” and we will insist on adherence to those ideals as we have so often in the past. The idea of America is stronger than any one cabal.

For two-hundred-fifty years the dream has lived, been tested, and endured. It lures the huddled masses. It makes us want to be free. It is a living idea that we celebrate today.

We consent to nothing less.



[i] Axios.com/newsletters, June 17, 2026

Tuesday, June 16, 2026

Decline and Fall.

 

The United States is 250 years old, and something is wrong. Very wrong.

You know it. Everyone knows it. You can feel it. People aren’t happy. It’s hard to define. How do you remedy a wrong you can’t define?

Is it the manic government we experience each day? Or is it the economics we don’t understand; or the prices we pay at the pump and the grocery outlets? Is it the divide between the have-nots, the have-a-lots, and the they-have-too-much folks?

Would better government policies cure the wrongs we can’t define? Would more competent cabinet secretaries make a difference? Is it time for religious leaders to get right-sided and preach a little kindness to us?

So what is the wrong? How do we define it? I can’t remember when so many people were so unhappy or so worried about the now and the future. Can you? It could be something that has been building for a decade or two and we just didn’t notice it, or it could be the recent debasing of our culture, or both and much more. I’m not sure, but I know wrong when I feel it.

You don’t have to read Gibbon’s six-volume classic, The History of the Decline  and Fall of the Roman Empire to see the similarities between then and now. The good news, I suppose is that the empire lasted a bit over four hundred years, so we still have some fix time.

It is almost too easy to find comparisons, not all the fault of our current leader, but heavily skewed in that direction. One could point out the economic crises we are enduring, of our own making: high inflation caused by a self-started war against Iran to achieve what had been achieved by a previous administration without a war. That leads to a discussion of the world’s distrust of our America First motives and growing willingness to use the Chinese Renminbi as the international currency.

One could point out the excessive costs of self-started wars in both money and armaments. We have shifted arms from around the world to the Near East, leaving our flanks vulnerable for years on end that it will take to rearm. To add to the strain, we have done everything in our power to excise ourselves from mutual aid agreements with other nations, reducing their incentive to come to our support if needed, as they did after 9/11.

One could point out the administration’s efforts to rule by executive decree instead of as one of the co-equal branches of the government. It has taken over independent agencies, vacuumed the halls of Congress of any power or influence and appointed sycophants to the judiciary in full view of everyone.

One could point out the depth of corruption in the current administration. We have seen corruption before; Andrew Johnson was known for his “pay-for-pardon” programs and his attempt to override the Tenure of Office Act. Grant was too loyal to his corrupt appointees’ tax evasion plots. Harding was known for graft and corruption at the highest levels, even leasing oil reserves for bribes. Nixon used his powers to direct the IRS, CIA and FBI to investigate his political enemies. We know what corruption looks like.

The level of corruption in and by the current administration would make the misdeeds of previous presidents seem trivial by comparison. Where to start?

What better way to celebrate the  semi-quincentennial anniversary than to build a monstrosity-looking fight cage on the White House lawn. To rejoice about the ability of our democracy and republic to outwit naysayers, combatants were cheered on by the nation’s leaders as they tried to do bodily harm to each other. To quote William Krystal of the Bulwark Newsletter, "it's violent, it's commercial, it's grandiose, it's tacky, and it dishonors a place once thought worthy of care and respect." It's on the White House lawn for god's sake. Remember when we were once the shining city on a hill, a light for the rest of the world to admire? This administration has no shame. It is wrong.

I’m going down a rabbit hole here, but is it just possible that we have lost a sense of class and a strong belief in democracy? The two go together.

It’s not very classy to tell someone that they aren’t very classy. But here goes. Most of our recent presidents have been classy people or at least pretended to be. They believed in the American experiment and understood the need for our fragile institutions. Our current administration isn’t very classy, from the top to the underlings. And most of them, from the top to the underlings, don’t believe in democracy, and therefore don’t mind destroying the institutions that make it work. The current use of Make America Great Again has made us a faltering democracy, a people unsure of their future, and degraded our values. We are even at the point where many question who is and who ought to be an American.

Maybe we just don’t know how to be classy anymore. It is the sort of thing you learn early on, on the knee of your elders, over time. Your institutions teach you how to behave, how to treat others, how to agree and disagree, how to socialize with folks who have different beliefs without upsetting the Thanksgiving dinner, and how to be nice even when we are being strong. We all miss the mark from time to time, but we know it, everyone around us knows it, and we apologize. Apology accepted; pass the gravy.

More deeply, we might ask if our leaders lack a decent level of civility, lack an appreciation for moderation and concession, lack basic social skills, or just have a mean streak that built up over the years. Look at some of the unclassy things they forced on us in the last couple of years.

Not to brag, but I’ve been around for the last thirty-five percent of our two-hundred-fifty years since broadcasting our independence to the world. I can’t remember a time when so many people tried so hard to destroy our institutions, our culture, and our general way of life. The lack of class is overwhelming and hard to comprehend.

In 1962, JFK gathered over one-hundred-seventy of the brightest intellectuals in the country to honor our Nobel Prize winners. He noted, “I think this is the most extraordinary collection of talent, of human knowledge, which has ever been gathered together at the White House, with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone."  Today our president begs aloud for the medal and willingly accepts one as a token from someone who actually earned hers. Recently, our president indicated that he might give himself the Medal of Honor. How far we have fallen. It’s wrong.

The Oval Office was a center of world influence: simple in design, strong in dignity,  quiet unspoken power prevailing  for all to see and admire. From that singular room, decisions were made that saved the democracies of Europe, sent men to the moon, fed the world’s hungry, improved educational opportunity;  mended the ravages of war and led a world order that stifled hostile interventions for nearly fifty years. It was the center of world power for decades: quiet, unobtrusive, majestic.

Today the room’s simplicity is replaced with cheap looking golden kitsch on the walls and fireplace, portraits hanging from every square inch of wall space, and used for verbal cage matches with world leaders. Today’s decisions create turmoil in the world, erase decades of effort to create a more perfect union, destroy our cherished institutions. What was once a national treasure is no more than a shell of our past.

The seldom quoted Calvin Coolidge once said that “It is a great advantage to a President and a major source of safety to the country, for him to know that he is not a great man.” It is hard to be a president without an outsized ego, without a tinge of grandiosity. But an inflated sense of self-importance, need for admiration, and a lack of empathy is a mental health issue. It has a name: NPD, Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

Sometimes when a person suffers from NPD they want to put their names on buildings dedicated to other heroes, put large banners of their picture on government buildings, or on new currency. I’m no doctor, but I know NPD when I see it.

I did some research about other presidents who put their names on government buildings while they were in office. There wasn’t much info on the subject. Surely there must be data about past presidents who wanted to put their image on our currency. Nope, nothing. There must be data about past presidents who wanted to build monuments to bust up the great design of DC by Pierre Charles L’Enfant in 1791. Nothing there either. I’m not a doctor, but …

Democracy is losing or it is taking on a new definition. Make America great again has been the mantra of presidents since Roosevelt and likely before. It was Reagan’s campaign slogan, Clinton used it all the time. Obama hoped for it. But none of the past presidents have done so much to tear down the institutions that define and support the concept of We The People. If the polls are correct, we may not have to suffer the destruction of our democracy, the majority of Americans do not support the President’s programs or the way they are implemented.

Hopefully, this isn’t what the start of the decline and fall look like.

 


 

Tuesday, February 24, 2026

The Right Thing.

Progress moves too slowly for those in a hurry.  Sometimes efforts to save our democracy seem slow apace. The simple truth remains: we are an experiment in men’s ability to govern themselves. Experiments take time. You try something, see if it works, determine whether you like it, put it out for comment, and see what happens. The Founders conceived a form of government never tried, only a concept. It is still in the trial stage.

Madison told us (The Federalist #51) that dividing government into equal branches would prevent despotism by one branch over another. It was an ingenious approach for the time. He saw the House as “the people,” the Senate as the “states.” He saw the Executive implementing the laws of the Legislature, and the Judicial as the limiter of each.

A government so conceived requires tenacity to maintain equilibrium. It is easy for one branch to put its thumb on the scale.  A Madisonian republic, however, was one in which “the legislative authority necessarily predominates” and the two houses “as little connected with each other as the nature of their common functions and their common dependence on the society will admit.”

Well, the last couple of decades show us what a lack of diligence can bring to a delicate attempt to be a free state. The Senate no longer calms the excesses of the House; Congress as a whole gives much of its authority to the Executive, the Judiciary seems comfortable with a strong executive at the helm, and a government less by the people than by the oligarchs and autocrats. Perhaps an extended generalization, but…

Churchill’s note that “Americans will always do the right thing, only after they have tried everything else” may be coming to pass. While still a majority conservative Court, it is a protector of the Constitution. Its job is to preserve the plain speak of the Founders. Article One, section eight of our Constitution states that “the Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises …”  Article Two gives no such power to the Executive.

The Supreme Court drew a red line last week. The Constitution prevailed. Justice Gorsich stated that while “the legislative process helps ensure each of us has a stake in the laws that govern us and in the Nation’s future… for some today, the weight of those virtues is apparent. For others, it may not seem so obvious… But if history is any guide, the tables will turn and the day will come when those disappointed by today’s result will appreciate the legislative process for the bulwark of liberty it is.”

Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, consolidated with V.O.S. Selections v. Trump, was a simple case; did the International Emergency Economic Powers Act authorize the President to impose tariffs? The Court said no. The Executive complained with vitriol. I'm reminded of Socrates's notion that, "When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser."

The ruling was really less about tariffs in made-up emergencies than it was about the limits of power enumerated in the Constitution. It was also a clarion call for the Legislature to start behaving like a law-making body is supposed to act.

A number of the Supremes are in the strong-executive camp, even those who purport to be originalists. In more than twenty recent cases, it gave the Executive traditional deference, even wide latitude on issues, and has generally continued to give the Department of Justice prosecutorial discretion. In Learning Resources, though, it drew a red line. The Executive must follow the Constitution. Churchill was right.

The current inhabitants of the Executive departments show their preference almost daily, bolstered by Project 2025’s misunderstanding of the Founder’s aim – a nation with the people as the source of power.

They immediately announced continued tariffs under different legislation. The Executive’s reaction to the Court’s decision demonstrated a lack of respect for checks and balances, rancor, and name-calling. It was as though the act of appointing someone to the Court required rulings in the Executive's favor on any issue as a matter of course. It had the stench of mob rule.

The shot across the bow of the Executive branch could be a precursor of future rulings when the Constitution is trampled. It could, and would in a normal administration, return ICE to following constitutional processes in its efforts to deport those who entered the country by illegal means. It might push these agencies to provide something as simple as due process before deporting. It might dissuade the agencies from creating concentration camps across the country, expected to hold tens of thousands of people for extended periods of time. It might urge them to remove masks from their officers or add identification to their uniforms.

If none of these things happen, at least the people of the nation know that there is a point beyond which the Court will not tolerate violation of the Constitution. For those who have taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitution, it could be a good start toward making democracy great again.