Tuesday, November 20, 2018

The Reds and the Blues


Look at any red and blue map of the U.S. It will show which political party dominates in each county across the country. It will also show the extent of the political and cultural divide of the nation. The mid-term election results are clear. A large number of Republican districts flipped in favor of the Democrats who will control the House. The Senate Republicans picked up seats, continuing their majority. The map won't tell the whole story, but it is a start.

If we allocated congressional seats based on territory instead of population, the Democrats would not stand a chance, even in California. But, we don’t. It is normal for the President’s party to lose big in the mid-term elections. It happens to the best of them. What is so striking, however, is the continued divide between the heartland and the two coasts, between the rural areas and the metropoles, between the highly educated and the less highly educated sections of the country, between the highly skilled work sites and those losing jobs in low skilled areas.

The new Congress will seat over 100 women, 25 will be under 40 years old, and two will be under 30 years old. The Congress will be the most diverse in history, with the first Native American women, about 27% people of color, and Muslims. The average age of House members will be 10 years younger than the last Congress.[i]   Change is on the way.

Large metropolitan areas and the ex-urbs’ issues differ from those of the heartland. The center of the country and rural areas in general still does not think that they have their fair share of the American dream. The question remains about how well the coastal Democrats can relate to and do something for those in the middle of the country and rural areas. On January 3, 2019, the slog will begin anew, but to what end.

A recent national survey confirmed the depth of the divide:  most Democrats think the Republicans are racists and sexists and most Republicans think Democrats are ignorant.[ii] That does not bode well for attempts to bring the nation together to work for the common good.

Mid-America, bombarded with the identity politics of the coasts, which it dislikes, and change that is too rapid to absorb is straining local institutions: schools, churches, and civic groups cannot keep up, so they dig in to preserve what once was. They could use some jobs. Amazon, however, chose to put their two new “headquarters” facilities in coastal metropolitan areas: Crystal City, Virginia, across from DC, and in Long Island City in Queens, New York. Those two facilities expect to hire 25,000 employees each. To be fair, its unlikely Amazon could find 50,000 high tech employees in one spot in the heartland. This continues a trend. Seventy-two percent of all new jobs created since the great recession has been in dense urban areas.[iii] In smaller cities, employment opportunity has decreased.

The population spread across the country divides us even more. Nine states account for 50% of the population.[iv] The 82 Senators, who represent the other 50% of the population, control what happens in the Senate. As a result, DC accomplishes little and respect for major institutions continues to dwindle.[v]

Cable-news doesn’t even try to hide its bias or its agenda of maintaining the divide. Sean Hannity, when discussing the late-vote counting in some states on his Fox News show implied that ballots still to be counted were “found” by corrupt officials trying to ensure a Democratic victory. When referring to the Senate races, he stated; “We won those races.”[vi] He is the “journalist” who spoke at Trump campaign rallies during the mid-terms. Hannity is not the only person creating the divide. Lawrence O’Donnell on MSNBC is as strong in his partisanship for the left as Hannity is for the right. Oddly, CNN appears to be the middle-of-the-road cable news channel.

The Democratic leadership already has a list of 85-100 investigations into the Trump administration. Those few that deal with corruption and malfeasance are legitimate. The party, however, is acting like a sore winner. They give every indication that they want to make Trump suffer rather than accomplishing positive things for the country. If they have any interest in winning the 2020 election they need to deliver practical programs to the people who need help. I doubt that an “I hate Trump” agenda will win the day.

It would be helpful if Congress concentrated on rebuilding the infrastructure of the country, which is falling apart more and more every day. Bridges need rebuilding, the grid is antiquated, the water and sewer systems are crumbling, the roads are giant potholes, and transportation systems inadequate. The nation’s healthcare and education systems need to catch up with the rest of the industrial world. We need a national strategy for AI. These types of programs put people to work, increase tax revenues, improve local economies and help us keep our competitive edge in the global economy.

The majority of people can get behind these types of programs. Action in these areas will show that those inside the beltway can achieve bipartisanship and can help the heartland. I suspect that the new, younger, and more diverse members of Congress will demand action from the old guard in leadership positions. Some have already protested outside leadership offices. The next two years should be interesting times.



[i] NPR -11/08/2018
[ii] Axios – Survey Monkey Online Poll 10/30-11/2/2018 – 11/12/2018
[iii] Clara Hendrickson, Mark Muro, William Galston – Countering the geography of discontent: Strategies for left behind places – Brookings Institute – November 2018
[iv] California, Texas, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, Georgia, and Florida – US Census, 2000
[v] Confidence in Institutions – Annual Survey – Gallup – 2018
[vi] YouTube – Fox News – Hannity Show – 11/12/2018



Tuesday, November 6, 2018

The West Wing!

The West Wing is the center of world power. Its inhabitants demonstrate good or ill, compassion or indifference, truth or fiction, power or impotence, take the moral high ground, or demonstrate obstructionism.

When Nathan Wyeth[i] designed the Oval Office, an appendage of the West Wing of the White House, he used the oval Blue Room as a design concept. It is unique and meant to intimidate those who enter.

The room is a symbol of our country, its power, and its influence in the world. Some call it a sacred space. During most of my growing-up years and since, the room’s occupants have treated it that way, demanding honor and respect for the presidency.

I find myself going back to that place often.

The West Wing is where I find solace and think about what could be. I especially favor the episodes that show the Oval Office with grown-ups acting in grown-up ways[ii].

 I find, to the amusement of many of my friends, that one or two episodes each week quiet the nerves and provide a needed break from the fulminations that emanate from this sacred inner sanctum. The play is better than reality.

Presidents get the blame for what goes wrong during their tenure and they get credit for what goes well, whether the result is because of their policies or those of past administrations. Given that rule of thumb, President Trump gets credit for one of the lowest unemployment rates in decades, for the stock market at an all-time high, for putting two nominees on the Supreme Court, and for building a solid base of supporters. The mounting deficit will be a negative in a few months, the result of a massive tax cut. He maintains a base of supporters that is strong if not very large. He is reducing regulations in spite of science that says he should not. The country is divided on his priorities. My observation is that the Oval Office changed past Presidents. Simply walking into the room would seem to overwhelm them with the enormous responsibility they shouldered.

Politics is a bloody contact sport. Campaigns are brutal. Once elected to the office of the President of the United States, however, people expect the President, difficult as it may be, to become “presidential.” It is hard to define “presidential” but you know it when you see it. I have not seen in lately, especially in the Oval Office. Today, the sacred space is treated like a TV set. Actors and reality show-people parade in and out for sound-bite moments; the stage is set for Executive-Order signings and photo ops.

Did other presidents use the Oval Office as a stage? Yes, but …

I wish our President would watch a couple of episodes of West Wing each week. It could change his perception of the presidency and might even change how he behaves in those sacred spaces.




[i] www.capitol.gov
[ii] West Wing – 155 Episodes – 1999-2006 - NBC