Monday, February 26, 2018

Are you suppressed?

It’s 1788 and you just read about a new vision for your government.  It starts with “We the People.”  In a world ruled by kings, queens, emperors, popes, sultans, tsars, and dictators, a group of colonies decided they could rule themselves.  That’s heady stuff.  That grand experiment’s survival is in jeopardy; too much power in the hands of too few. 

Fareed Zakaria recently wrote about the decline of democracy around the world.[i]    He observed that most Americans don’t believe it can happen here.  We are not Poland or Hungary after all where democracy wanes.  Yet, we do see signs of it deteriorating here at home. 

History demonstrates that power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.[ii]  Cliché aside, corruption festers when those in power are emboldened to take away the rights of the minority.  How does this happen?

Let’s look at three of many causes: too much money in the system, too many levels of government ruled by one party and too much suppression of voting rights.  One follows the other.  Each deserves in-depth analysis at some point.  

Money has always been the mother’s milk of politics, but the Supreme Court opened the spigot to a full gush in its ruling in Citizens United.  Now, a few unnamed individuals and corporations can create Super-PACs to buy off candidates for Congress, state legislatures and local governments without revealing who they are.  Vast amounts of money target candidates who, when elected, will do the bidding of the donor.  When you consider that the moneyed oligarchs own 90% of the nation’s wealth, you know who controls the government: it’s not the majority, but the few. 

Thirty-five state governors are Republicans.  Their party controls 32 state legislatures with veto-proof majorities in 17 of them.  The people elected these majorities.  It says that the Democratic Party wasn’t in tune with the people of those states.  Super majorities aren’t healthy for the nation, no matter which party is in the lead.  When either party has too much power, we know corruption is on the doorstep. 

Once a group gets control of the system, it wants to keep control.  The party in power can pass laws that make it difficult to register to vote, and difficult to actually cast a ballot.  We saw this, particularly in the South, when laws prohibited African-Americans from voting, when Poll Taxes were imposed to keep the poor and opposition from voting.  Suppression continues today in many states with laws and regulations that discourage people from registering, and voting.  Gerrymandering, the process of designing congressional and state legislative districts to favor one party over another is a favorite voter suppression technique.  It is so commonplace and so egregious that two State Supreme Courts have overturned the laws recently, requiring new voting districts that are balanced.  Why does it matter?

Zakaria reminded us of Emerson’s notion that “Institutions are collections of rules and norms agreed upon by human beings.  If leaders attack, denigrate, and abuse them, they will be weakened, and this, in turn, will weaken the character and quality of democracy.”[iii]  When political leaders attack and abuse our right to vote they weaken democracy at its core.  When we lose the right to vote we blur the vision of our Founding Fathers. 

Any citizen over the age of 18 should be able to register to vote, and to vote with no constraints other than showing that they live in a state and local town or district.  My state, California, for example, has automatic registration.  If you are a citizen, the state automatically adds you to the rolls when you apply for a driver’s license or state issued identification cardIf you are too young to vote, they add your name to the rolls when you turn 18.  When you change an address or other information on your license or ID, it edits the election rolls.  You can decline voter registration if you wish.  This year our county is experimenting with vote-by-mail.  At the next election, in June, every registered voter will receive a ballot in the mail; they can fill out the ballot at home, put it in a sealed envelope and mail it back to the county election office or take it to a drop-off ballot box.  How easy is that?  Three states already do this.[iv]

It’s easy for states to suppress voter participation: no automatic registration, no same-day registration, no pre-registration if under 18, no online registration, no early voting, and no vote by mail, no absentee voting, and restrictive documentation for registration and restrictive identification requirements to actually vote.  Go to www.rockthevote.org to see how your state stacks up.   

The right-to-vote is not an exciting topic for discussion, unless you lose it.  Too many states thwart the right of people to vote.  Imagine election districts drawn to give both parties 50% of the electorate, 50% of ethnic or racial groups, or held closely to city or county boundaries.  Imagine what it would be like if “We the People” all had an equal voice in government.  It would be easy to register to vote and it would be easy to vote in every state.

The amount of money that controls campaigns and the candidates is an abuse of democracy and that democracy will wither.  Legislatures that gerrymander election districts blur the vision of our Founding Fathers and we become just another country, but without character.  We become just another people wondering what happened, another people wondering who let the dream die.  We will wonder how it could happen here.


 



[i]Fareed Zakaria – Washington Post column – February 23, 2018
[ii]John Dalberg-Acton - Letter to Bishop Mandell Creighton, April 5, 1887 - published in Historical Essays and Studies, edited by J. N. Figgis and R. V. Laurence (London: Macmillan, 1907
[iii]Ralph Waldo Emerson – Essays – Self Reliance - 1841
[iv]Oregon, Washington and Colorado




Chuck Woods
February 26, 2018

Friday, February 16, 2018

How Long O Lord?

When is it time to talk and act?  We are told it is too soon.  Members of Congress and State Legislators are complicit in the death of schoolchildren across the land if they do not act.  Now is the time!

Let’s be sure we understand why there is never a good time to talk about gun violence, why nothing has changed...  It is because of the millions upon millions of dollars that the gun lobby – manufacturers and NRA – pour into the campaign coffers of our leaders.  Campaign contributors expect their paid minions to vote the way they want them to vote.  When the Speaker of the House receives hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from the NRA, he feels duty bound to say that it is too early to talk about guns.

The Second Amendment does not guarantee every citizen the right to carry assault type weapons.  Those weapons are designed to kill people not wild game.  We all know what kind of guns we need for hunting.  No self-respecting hunter would take an A-15 into the woods in search of a deer.  The 30-30 carbine or 306 rifles works just fine.  A 12-gauge pump-action works just fine for duck and partridges. 

The Second Amendment does not guarantee that mentally unstable people should be able to purchase weapons.

And yet… and yet, last year Congress repealed a law that allowed mentally ill persons to be listed in the background check database.  Senator Grassley, who championed the repeal, was seen on television on February 15, 2018, wondering why mentally ill people were able to own guns.  The hypocrisy is palpable.

The Psalmist wonders aloud and we should too: How long O Lord?  How long before the hypocrisy ends?  How long before people demand that something needs to be done?  Why can’t we have laws similar to other countries?  Laws that work!  Laws that reduce death from guns to the rare few!

Gun Control, by itself.  isn’t the answer.  Hunters should be able to hunt and families should be able to protect themselves if they feel the need.  But, we can rewrite the HIPPA laws to allow medical personnel and families to report the mentally ill.  We can reduce gun clip size.  We can reduce the number of cartridges allowed per hunting gun.  We can reduce the number and types of handguns available for sale.  None of these steps takes away Second Amendment rights.

How long after Sandy Hook is it OK to talk about and act on our national problem?  Our national shame?  Our national nightmare?  This week we witnessed the 18th school shooting since the beginning of 2018.

How Long O Lord?


Wednesday, February 7, 2018

You Read What?



Is plagiarism still in style?  Every now and then, something just needs copying.  The web site allgeneralizationsarefalse.com recently published its 2017 Media Bias Chart.  It’s full of generalizations and bias.

The premise is simple: create a chart that rates news organizations on quality of content (from garbage, to fair, to factual) and political persuasion (from ultra liberal to mainstream to ultra conservative).  How hard could that be?

I know people who think Fox News is fair and balanced, and some who look to MSNBC for the truth.  Watching either in the last two weeks could easily drive you to CNN.  Newspapers are dropping like flies as ad dollars move to the web.  Young people don’t read newspapers anymore.  They get their news from Facebook, Instagram, and Reddit.  Really?

The point is that millions upon millions of people get their news from web sites.  Each site has its bias and its demonstrated value for the truth.  I like my news straight up: Who, What, Where, When.  I want opinion on the op-ed page.  I like both well written.  You can find that kind of reporting at (here comes a bias) the New York Times, Politico, npr, PBS, The Hill, Time and BBC among others. 

To be fair, those with reasonable opinions and interpretation of the news also include the New Yorker, Vanity Fair, Mother Jones, Buzz Feed, National Review, The Weekly Standard, and the Daily Mail.  (You should be editing by now.)  

The Drudge Report, Federalist, and Huffington Post tend to cluster with the cable news channels at the lower end of the scales.

The really biased and fabricators of information and junk reporting include Red State, Breitbart, Forward Progressives, US Uncut, and Infoward.

I admit to a demented need to know what is going on in the world.  I read several news sites before breakfast because the morning newspaper went to press at ten o’clock the night before and a lot of tweeting can occur during sleep time. 

On the oft chance that not everyone is a news hound and only read or watch two or three news sources each day, it’s helpful to consider their quality and bias.  Go to 2017MediaBiasChart.com to see how news sources can be arrayed.  I’ve already deleted a couple of sites from my bookmark list and added new ones that are supposedly less biased and ranked higher for quality of reporting.  

What do you think?