Sunday, March 15, 2020

The Ides of March?




We are in the midst of a worldwide health pandemic according to the World Health Organization. The President asked Vice President Pence to lead a blue-ribbon task force to manage the outbreak. He gathered agency heads, healthcare professionals, and others to help him. He holds daily briefings to keep people up to date. The experts, not the politicians make the major presentations and appear on the Sunday morning news shows. I give them the benefit of the doubt. I think they are trying to be as helpful as possible within the limits of their political world.

The task force does a much better job when President Trump doesn’t participate. What we do with the information is interesting. In the worse health scare in American history, our beliefs, and actions are dictated by which political party we belong to instead of facts and science.

According to a national poll published this morning[i], 45% of voting Americans approve of how Trump is handling the pandemic. Only 51% disapprove. A deeper dive into the data, however, indicates that 81% of Republican voters approve the administration’s actions and 84% of Democrats disapprove. The divide is wide and deep.

How did we get to the point where our party affiliation influences our acceptance of facts, data, science, health warnings, and general overall behavior in the midst of a major health outbreak?

The health scientists, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and others are telling elderly people, anyone over 60 years old, to stay home, to isolate themselves, to stay away from other people who might be carrying the virus without knowing it. They are discouraging young people from visiting their grandparents and other elderly.  

The poll also indicated that 56% of Democrats expect major changes in their lives because of the virus. Only 26% of Republicans think the outbreak will result in major changes in their lives.

Schools are closed, college students won’t return from spring break, the Fed reduced interest rates to 0%, MLB is shut down, the NBA is waiting it out, March Madness is canceled. Even pro golf is in a hiatus. If you have seen all the classic movies three times, can’t watch one more reality TV program, and there are no sports on the screen, it’s safe to say that our lives are changed.  

We are told that this coronavirus has the potential for killing thousands of people if we don’t hunker down. Its not the flu and should not be taken lightly. We, unlike many other countries, do not have working test kits to measure how bad the situation really is. We do know that the virus doubles its attacks every two weeks. Much of the leadership in combating the virus is coming, not from the federal government, but from the states and local governments who are relying on the science to take action. The governors of Illinois and Ohio closed all restaurants and bars today. The Governor of California ordered all wineries, brewpubs, and bars to close, and for restaurants to slash seating by half. At the same time, Congressman Nunes[ii] was on TV encouraging people to ignore the health experts, and get out to the restaurants and mingle with crowds. As we get more facts, day by day, the recommendations for self-isolation are expected to increase, hospitals will be overwhelmed with sick people, and supplies will be in short supply. The mixed messages from political toadies and the scientist are confusing.

The President made a major speech to the nation from the Oval Office last Wednesday night, trying to calm the panic, bolster recognition for the work he had done to date, and to tell the people that this too will pass. At best, he fumbled it. It was poorly written, and it was poorly delivered. It created uncertainty. The markets hate uncertainty, and they tanked the next morning as never before.  

Rachel Maddow on MSBC interviewed experts who had managed pandemic situations in the past, who knew something about testing and why we didn’t have kits, and filled in most of the blank spaces with opinion unfavorable to the speech and/or the administration. In an attempt to be fair and balanced, I switched to Fox News.

Hannity was extolling the outstanding job President Trump had done to curb the virus and how test kits were available all over the country for those who needed them. He said you could not expect a greater response than what the administration had done. He suggested that if anyone had any suggestions for improving the response they should email him.

On Friday afternoon I experienced another surprise on Fox News. One of the shows was talking about the coronavirus in the same way that other cable channels reported the news. That’s when I remembered that there are two Fox News if you will: the news department and the talking heads. Then my head spun again when Tucker Carlson, not the most unbiased right-wing commentator, warned people that the pandemic is real, and not a conspiracy by the leftist socialists.

Most Republicans trend toward Fox News and most Democrats lean toward CNN and MSNBC. In a time of crisis, like the one we are experiencing, we should expect that cable news outlets could take the politics out of the equation and report the news: who, what, where, when. This is a time when scientists should be the guests on interview shows, not politicians, or those with a political bias.

Its time to stop the flat-earth approach to science, health, and well-being. We could use some more leadership from Fox News and MSBC, the two cable outlets who have done more than most to divide the nation.




[i] NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll – March 15, 2020
[ii] Devan Nunes – California 22nd District – Sometimes referred to as the poster boy of Trump sycophants?